The National Statistics Institute of Spain confirmed today that the Spanish GDP has fallen 0,3% in the first quarter, Q1 whites say.
The trouble is that we have been two "QUS" negative, which economists say recession is technically called.
We return, as two years ago, the recession. But the worst is that Spain will remain in negative in successive "QUS", and economists call this depression.
<< Look at Rafael, John tells me, Car shop owner near my house - these economists do not know what they say. I assure you that in depression, what is said in depression, we are already long, or many "QUS" as you call it. Depression is on the loose everywhere, All around me are depressed. Myself for example, How could I get depressed if I am billed a 25% less?. My son is an architect, completed an internship makes a lot of "QUS" and is depressed because he can not find another job, my wife but I know we are encouraged that the procession is on the inside ...
Depression more than what we started to feel is fear about what might happen ... >>
Not without reason John. We are not only GDP but also low FIB.
According to Wikipedia, Gross National Happiness (FIB) or Gross National Happiness (FNB) is an indicator that measures the quality of life in more holistic and psychological terms than Gross Domestic Product(GDP).
The term was proposed by Jigme Singye Wangchuck, King of Bhutan,in 1972 in response to criticism of the continued economic poverty of their country.
While conventional economic models economic growth seen as objective, FIB concept is based on the premise that true development of human society is on the complementarity and mutual reinforcement of material and spiritual development. The four pillars of the FIB: promoting sustainable and equitable socioeconomic development, the preservation and promotion of cultural values, environmental conservation and the establishment of good governance.
Arrea!!! Will the RSC has one of its origins in 1972 in Bhutan?
Self-reflection:
Do you think the GDP, productivity, competitiveness,... Must remain the parameters for measuring the wealth of a country, without addressing social conditions?
Would you agree on the implementation of measurement parameters of social responsibility for companies and organizations in general?
Course,if companies are measured by the social respnsabilidad never get a crisis like the present,which has dominated the personal benefit,only by the neglect of this responsibility has been made the atrocities that have led to economic crisis and this is the same irresponsibility that makes the crises there are people who do not have to eat so that others continue to maintain the outrageous percentages of benefits according
So citizens should take more commitment by consuming (CONSUMISABLES) and by investing our savings (INVERSABLES).
But to make this commitment a reality requires homogeneous and reliable assessments that allow for implementation in practice, not only for the gallery, CSR where products and businesses reflect their social competitiveness as a complement to current binomial money.